Richter Leads Sotheby’s London Contemporary Art Sales

A Gerhard Richter abstract painting sold Tuesday night at Sotheby’s contemporary art auction in London for £30.4 million, or about $46.3 million, including fees.

The monumental, 10-foot high canvas, “Abstraktes Bild,” numbered 599 and painted with veils of red, blue and green pigment, was bought by a telephone bidder, represented by Cheyenne Westphal, Sotheby’s worldwide co-head of contemporary art, after lengthy competition from another telephone bidder.

Estimated at £14 million to £20 million, the painting had last appeared at auction in May 1999, when it sold for $607,500 at Sotheby’s New York.

“These days there are plenty of collectors who can take a painting that big,” said Christophe Van de Weghe, the New York dealer. “There are new private museums opening up all over the world.”

The Richter proved the most expensive lot at Sotheby’s evening auction of 75 contemporary works, which raised £123.5 million, with 86.5 percent of the material successful. Other stand-out results included the £8.4 million paid by another telephone bidder for a 1965 Lucio Fontana white “Concetto Spaziale, Attese” canvas with no fewer than 23 of the Italian artist’s trademark cuts.

Paul Gauguin's Tahitian Girls Becomes The World's Most Expensive Artwork

 A painting of two Tahitian girls by Paul Gauguin has become the world’s most expensive work of art, after a member of the Qatar Royal family privately paid $300m (£196.7m) for it. The 1892 artwork titled 'Nafea Faa Ipoipo' (When Will You Marry?) wa…

 

A painting of two Tahitian girls by Paul Gauguin has become the world’s most expensive work of art, after a member of the Qatar Royal family privately paid $300m (£196.7m) for it. The 1892 artwork titled 'Nafea Faa Ipoipo' (When Will You Marry?) was sold by former Sotheby’s boss Rudolf Staechelin, who resides in Basel Switzerland.  This is not the first time a major painting has been purchased for well over the market value by the Qatars. The Card Players By Paul Cezanne sold was sold to the royals in 2011 for $250m (£165m). This work of art previous held the record for the most expensive work of art.
 

Until recently, this overlooked work by Gauguin was hanging in the Kunstmuseum in Basel. The Qatar Museums, have very deep pockets and have spent more than $1bn investing oil dollars in the art market. Other works believed to have been bought by the family include Mark Rothko’s White Centre (Yellow, Pink and Lavender) in which they paid $72.8m. Andy Warhol’s Men in Her Life for $63.4m,  Damien Hirst’s Lullaby for $19m. And Picasso’s Girl With A Dove, a painting which used to hang in London's National Gallery. The Qatar Royal Family are reported to be putting together a world class collection which will go on display ahead of the World Cup in 2022.

Eugène Henri Paul Gauguin (French: 7 June 1848 – 8 May 1903) was a French Post-Impressionist artist recognised for his experimental use of color and synthetist style that were distinguishably different from Impressionism. His work was influential to the French avant-garde and many modern artists, such as Pablo Picasso and Henri Matisse. Gauguin’s art became popular after his death and many of his paintings were in the possession of Russian collector Sergei Shchukin.

He was an important figure in the Symbolist movement as a painter, sculptor, print-maker, ceramist, and writer. His bold experimentation with color led directly to the Synthetist style of modern art, while his expression of the inherent meaning of the subjects in his paintings, under the influence of the cloisonnist style, paved the way to Primitivism and the return to the pastoral. He was also an influential proponent of wood engraving and woodcuts as art forms.
 

The Broad, New Contemporary Art Museum In Los Angeles, To Open To The Public September 20

The Broad, the new contemporary art museum in downtown Los Angeles, announced yesterday that it will open to the public on Sunday, September 20, 2015.

Built by philanthropists and longtime art collectors Eli and Edythe Broad, The Broad will welcome visitors from near and far with free general admission to an inaugural installation drawn from two collections of more than 2,000 works of contemporary art. Designed by Diller Scofidio + Renfro (DS+R), The Broad makes its home in the city's burgeoning Grand Avenue arts corridor, across the street from architectural icons including Walt Disney Concert Hall and the Museum of Contemporary Art.

"Edye and I are delighted to announce an opening date, and we are already looking forward to welcoming the public to our museum," said Eli Broad. "It is our privilege to give this museum, the works in our art collections and a sizeable endowment and free admission as a gift to the people of Los Angeles."

"When we open our doors on September 20, we will be greatly advancing Eli and Edye's vision of sharing contemporary art with the broadest possible audience," said Joanne Heyler, founding director of The Broad. "The combination of innovative architecture and provocative art will make visiting The Broad an experience to remember."

The new museum's opening installation will be a predominantly chronological selection of masterworks from the Broads' extraordinary personal art collection as well as that of The Broad Art Foundation. The installation will begin with works by major artists who came to prominence in the 1950s, including Jasper Johns, Robert Rauschenberg and Cy Twombly. The Pop art of the 1960s—an area of great depth in the collections—will be represented through works by Roy Lichtenstein, Ed Ruscha and Andy Warhol, among others. Moving into the 1980s—the decade when The Broad Art Foundation was established—the installation will present a rich concentration of works by artists such as Jean-Michel Basquiat, Cindy Sherman, Keith Haring, Barbara Kruger and Jeff Koons. The installation will continue up through the present, with works including a monumental, immersive, eight-screen video piece, The Visitors, by Icelandic artist Ragnar Kjartansson, which was only recently acquired for the collections, among many other new acquisitions.

With construction of the building nearing completion, The Broad is offering the public an unprecedented glimpse into the unfinished museum on Sunday, Feb. 15, when two temporary art installations will activate the expansive third-floor gallery. Titled Sky-lit: Volume, Light, and Sound at The Broad the multi-hour timed ticket event will include works by BJ Nilsen and Yann Novak.

Artist BJ Nilsen's sound installation DTLA, draws on the aural environment of Los Angeles. Just as The Broad's porous architectural "veil" subtly interweaves natural light and glimpses of the urban streetscape of Grand Avenue into its galleries, Nilsen will bring the soundscape of downtown Los Angeles into The Broad. Stillness, the second installation featured as part of Sky-lit, will be activated after dark, and is a sound and light work by Los Angeles multidisciplinary artist Yann Novak. Stillness creates an immersive environment for reflection, inviting visitors to contemplate the effect of climate and light on their physical and emotional states.

Tickets will go on sale at 10 a.m. on Friday, Feb. 6. Tickets are $10 and will be reserved for every half hour from 3 p.m. through 10 p.m., with the last entry at 9 p.m. Nilsen's work will be presented beginning at 3 p.m., and Novak's work will be added at 5 p.m., with the two works running simultaneously until 10 p.m. Tickets are available at www.thebroad.org/skylit.

The Broads have been at the center of the civic and cultural development of downtown Los Angeles since they moved to the city in 1964. The couple has spent five decades assembling two of the world's most admired collections of postwar and

contemporary art, with the aim of creating a widely accessible public collection. In addition to their personal collection, they created The Broad Art Foundation in 1984 as a lending library of contemporary art for museums around the world. The foundation, which will be headquartered in the new museum, has made more than 8,000 loans to over 500 museums.

The Collection

Works from both The Broad Art Foundation collection and the Eli and Edythe L. Broad Collection will be shown at The Broad.

The Broad collections include the largest grouping of Cindy Sherman works in the world, one of the largest of Jeff Koons, the largest collection of Roy Lichtenstein's works outside of the Lichtenstein Foundation, the only near-complete grouping of the 570-plus multiples of Joseph Beuys in the Western U.S. and one of the most significant groupings of Christopher Wool paintings. Among the other artists represented in depth in the continually growing collections are Richard Artschwager, John Baldessari, Jean-Michel Basquiat, Chuck Close, Eric Fischl, Leon Golub, Andreas Gursky, Damien Hirst, Jasper Johns, Mike Kelley, Ellsworth Kelly, Glenn Ligon, Sharon Lockhart, Lari Pittman, Charles Ray, Robert Rauschenberg, Ed Ruscha, Frank Stella, Philip Taaffe, Robert Therrien, Cy Twombly, Kara Walker, Andy Warhol and Terry Winters.

The Design

DS+R's remarkable design for The Broad features public gallery spaces on the first and third floors, with a central "vault" housing collection storage and staff offices seeming to hover between. Upon entering the lobby, visitors will travel up a 105-foot escalator through the concrete vault and emerge into the third-floor gallery, which features 23-foot ceilings and 318 skylights that filter diffused sunlight. Upon exiting the third floor, most visitors will again descend through the vault via a central stairwell, which offers glimpses of the artwork in the archive that may be displayed in future exhibitions.

Wrapped around the Grand Avenue elevation of the building, like a "veil," is a porous exoskeleton made of concrete panels and steel. The veil filters natural daylight into the building's interior and establishes lines of sight between the museum and the street. The veil lifts at the south and north corners of the building to define two street-level entrances.

Gensler served as executive architect for the museum building project.

Integral to the project is an adjacent 24,000-square-foot outdoor public plaza, also designed by DS+R, which stretches from Hope Street to Grand Avenue. Featuring a grove of 100-year-old Barouni olive trees and a large lawn, as well as enhanced landscaping and improvements along Grand Avenue, the plaza adds a much-needed parcel of green space to the downtown cultural corridor and makes the area more pedestrian-friendly. On its western end, the plaza will feature an adjacent restaurant that is being developed by The Broad in partnership with Bill Chait and his company Sprout.

The Programs

In keeping with Eli and Edythe Broad's longstanding support of the arts and their commitment to making contemporary art available to all, The Broad will host an ambitious series of public programs. In addition to the upcoming Sky-lit, The Broad has held a number of pre-opening events, including a series of art talks started in 2013 titled The Un-Private Collection, featuring artists whose works are represented in the collection in conversation with recognized cultural leaders. These public discussions included Mark Bradford with Katy Siegel, Shirin Neshat with Christy MacLear, Jeff Koons with John Waters, Takashi Murakami with Pico Iyer, Eric Fischl with Steve Martin, John Currin with James Cuno and Kara Walker with Ava DuVernay.

http://www.thebroad.org/#

Mexico's Best Contemporary Art Hotspots

CURRO Y PONCHO

In Guadalajara, Mexico, a big, but less expansive city than Mexico City, is an art scene to rival the one in the nation’s capital – in no small part due to Curro y Poncho, which opened in 2008. Not only are they known for innovative and interesting shows, but they also show a hearty selection of Mexican installation artists like Alejandro Almanza Pereda (who will show at Zona Maco’s Sur section), Gabriel Rico, and Thomas Jeppe, an Australian installation artist (who they are showing at this years Zona Maco).

HOUSE OF GAGA

A newer gallery, but a force in ultra coolness, House of Gaga might be young but it’s become quickly established in Mexico City, and the art world at large. With represented artists including Sam Pulitzer, (an artist and writer based out of New York), and Jose Rojas, (an installation artist born and based in Mexico City), Gaga has international intentions and appeal.

KURIMANZUTTO

One of Mexico City’s best inveterate galleries, Kurimanzutto is run by a husband and wife team who have been showing work in the city since 1999, and opened their current space in 2008. They show the country’s best contemporary artists, as well as several all-star international artists. Kurimanzutto represents Gabriel Orozco, one of the worlds most important contemporary artists, and certainly the most famous and followed contemporary artist from Mexico, as well as important non-natives like collaborative artists Allora & Calzadilla and Sarah Lucas.

PROYECTO PARALELO

Since opening in 2012, Proyecto Paralelo have shown works by Joan Jonas, Richard Serra, and John Baldessari. Big names, yes, and surely an indication of the art world’s growing interest in the city, and the city’s growing interest in the art world. But, the gallery’s specialty is largely in mid-career and emerging contemporary Latin American artists. At Zona Maco this year they will present artist Alberto Baraya, a Colombian artist whose work is and has been an in depth study of post-colonialism vis a vis botanical and scientific reclamation, among others.

PROYECTO MONCLOVA

Proyecto Monclova is the kind of gallery that is, and without doubt will continue to be, on the list of must-see galleries in Mexico City. Opened in 2011, they have shown work by such a vast array of artists from different places and stages in career, but artists that always have a sort of performative and art historical weight. Some of their represented artists include Marie Lund, Simon Fujiwara (an artist on a swift rise to artworld fame), and fascinating Mexican artists Mario Garcia Torres and Eduardo Terrazas. Proyecto Monclova’s distinct eye for the best and most compelling, both international and national, are essential to their place in Mexico City’s art community, and it’s rise to importance.

LABOR

Labor opened in 2011, representing artists from all over the world, predominantly from the America’s and France. Labor is the perfect name for this gallery, as many of the artists represented deal with work, or perhaps more correctly, working class ideas and ideals. Be it Jill Magid, Hector Zamora, or Santiago Sierra (who will be showing at Zona Maco and whose work ranges in media from photography to performance and is about survival, labor, and capitalism and the brutality inherent in all of that), Labor  shows many artists that subvert, in some way, class systems or strict structures, in any sense. It is because of this that Labor may be the gallery most tuned into it’s home city’s atmosphere and current cultural climate.

GALERIA OMR

Galeria OMR is one of the oldest and most established galleries in Mexico City. Since 1983 they have been known for their avant-garde exhibitions, and are known for showing museum quality shows and artists. They’ve put up solos of James Turrell, and represents promising emerging Mexican artists like Jose Davila, Pia Camil and Julieta Aranda who will be shown as part of their presentation at Zona Maco.

TRAVESIA CUATRO

Another gallery that represents Jose Davila is Travesia Cuatro, and like Curro y Poncho, located in the smaller but happening city of Guadalajara. Their first space opened in Madrid in 2003, and ten years later they opened their second space in Mexico. A sort of exodus, or rather, a pilgrimage has been happening - art enthusiasts, dealers, artists, curators have not only been visiting but have been settling in Mexico, ready and excited to be there just at the moments before, and during, Mexico’s rise to art world power. Travesia Cuatro is one of these pilgrims, and certainly one of the good ones. With artists including Davila, Jis, Mateo Lopez, Milena Muzquiz, and Sarah Crowner, this gallery brings in a sort of breath of fresh air to the scene - a more light-hearted take on the contemporary art scene both in Mexico and abroad.

YAUTEPEC

Another product of the pilgrimage is Yautepec, which was founded in 2008 by Daniela Elbahara and Brett W Schultz; in 2014 they also founded the Material Art Fair, Zona Maco’s edgier young cousin, which is now in its 2nd Edition. The fair is exhibiting galleries from the United States, but not at all your typical selection - showing, yet again, the inclusivity of the local scene. Some of their artists to watch include Ryan Perez, Deborah Delmar Corp., and Txema Novelo.

LULU

The newest addition to Mexico City’s scene is another product of the pilgrimage, as we’ll call it, Lulu is an project space run by artist Martin Soto Clement and independant curator Chris Sharp. Their inaugural show was a solo by Detroit native Michael E. Smith: a promising way to begin. Next up they are showing at the Material Art Fair, and their second show, titled Lulennial: A Slight Gestuary opens 7 February and runs through mid-May. The show includes such names as Yoko Ono, Francis Alÿs, Darren Bader, Gabriel Orozco, and B. Wurtz. If this is a sign of things to come for Mexico’s art scene, then things are looking up.

What Are America's Top 10 Private Contemporary Art Museums?

THE BRANT FOUNDATION ART STUDY CENTER
Location: Greenwich, Connecticut
Founder: Peter Brant
Year founded: 2009

The Brant Foundation has primarily an educational focus, but features long-term exhibitions from the foundation's collection as well, including a recent survey show of Julian Schnabel—the artist's first in this country since 2002—and an ongoing Dan Colen exhibition.

DE LA CRUZ COLLECTION
Location: Miami, Florida
Founders: Rosa and Carlos de la Cruz
Year founded: 2009

The de la Cruz Collection, which focuses on contemporary art as well as art education, has been open to the public since 2009—though its director, Ibett Yanez, points out that people had been able to privately ask to see the collection for the previous 25 years. The collection is housed in a distinctive building that is also an extension of Rosa and Carlos de la Cruz's home. Built in the middle of the Miami Design District, the Collection has been a seminal attraction for art world migrants attending Art Basel in Miami Beach since the fair launched in 2002.

EL SEGUNDO MUSEUM OF ART
Location: El Segundo, California
Founders: Eva and Brian Sweeney
Year founded: 2013

An offshoot of the ARTLAB 21 Foundation, the El Segundo Museum of Art was founded by architect Eva Sweeney and real estate developer Brian Sweeney. Described as a “laboratory," the museum shows the Sweeneys' impressive and eclectic collection, which includes a range of modern and contemporary artists including Gustav Klimt, Andy Warhol, Chuck Close, and Claude Monet.

FISHER LANDAU CENTER FOR ART
Location: Queens, New York
Founder: Emily Fisher Landau
Year founded: 1991 (open to the public since 2002)

The Fisher Landau Center for Art was originally built in 1991 as a private storage facility for much of Emily Fisher Landau's collection, and in 2002 it opened to the public. The center boasts 1,500 works, most of which date from “1960 to the present." The Fisher collection includes works by Cy Twombly, Robert Rauschenberg, Matthew Barney, Jasper Johns, and Ed Ruscha, among many others. Landau is a trustee of the Whitney Museum, to which she has donated works by Willem de Kooning, Andy Warhol, Carl Andre, and Kiki Smith, to name just a few.

GLENSTONE
Location: Potomac, Maryland
Founders: Mitchell and Emily Rales
Year founded: 2006

Though Glenstone has held only four exhibitions at its 200 acre Potomac, Maryland, estate since 2006, the depth and strength of its collection can be seen in larger public museums on the east coast and in Europe this year alone. One of the Rales's holdings featured prominently in the New York Jewish Museum's recent Mel Bochner retrospective (see "Mel Bochner's 'Strong Language' at The Jewish Museum"), and two others are on view in MoMA's "Christopher Williams: The Production Line of Happiness" exhibition (see "Christopher Williams at MoMA: The Aesthetics of Smartypants").

GOSS-MICHAEL FOUNDATION
Location: Dallas, Texas
Founders: George Michael and Kenny Goss
Year founded: 2007

Founded by singer George Michael and his partner Kenny Goss, the foundation is based in Dallas, Texas, and showcases their personal collection of British contemporary art, including works like Damien Hirst's Saint Sebastian Exquisite Pain. The foundation, whose first show was curated by Hirst, also provides exhibitions for emerging British artists who may not have gained much exposure in the US.

HALL ART FOUNDATION
Location: Reading, Vermont
Founders: Andrew and Christine Hall
Year founded: 2007

The Hall Art Foundation was created by Andrew J. Hall, a former Citigroup trader who also dabbles in organic farming, and his wife, Christine. They have also partnered with Mass MoCA for a long-term installation devoted to the works of Anselm Kiefer from the Halls' collection. In addition to Kiefer, the Halls' collection of over 5,000 pieces of postwar and contemporary art includes works by Joseph Beuys, Eric Fischl, Andy Warhol, and Malcolm Morley, among others.

LINDA PACE FOUNDATION
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Founder: Linda Pace
Year founded: 2003

The Linda Pace Foundation was founded by its namesake in 2003. Linda Pace, an artist and collector, died in 2007. Her foundation manages and exhibits a collection of about 500 works, which is mostly focused on contemporary art from US artists, and includes works by Marilyn Minter, Wangechi Mutu, Dario Robleto, Isa Genzken, and others.

PIER 24
Location: San Francisco, California
Founder: Andy Pilara
Year founded: 2010

Billing itself as a “place to view and think about photography," Pier 24 is a 28,000-square-foot warehouse space that serves as a home for the Pilara Foundation Collection. Its free admission (with appointment) offers the public a chance to see what is probably the largest dedicated space for photography on the West Coast, if not the entire country. In addition to exhibiting works from the Foundation's collection—which includes virtually every major figure in contemporary photography, from Richard Avedon and Lee Friedlander to Catherine Opie and Jeff Wall—Pier 24 also mounts special exhibitions.

RUBELL FAMILY COLLECTION
Location: Miami, Florida
Founders: Donald and Mera Rubell
Year founded: 1964 in New York (in Miami since 1993)

Housed in a 45,000-square-foot former DEA facility, the Rubells' museum counts artworks by Andy Warhol, Kara Walker, Keith Haring, Cindy Sherman, and Jeff Koons in its collection. While it is considered to be one of the founding “Miami Model" private collecting institutions that helped spawn Art Basel in Miami Beach, several of the RFC's recent exhibitions have traveled to public institutions including the Brooklyn Museum and the North Carolina Museum of Art.

Wadsworth Atheneum’s New Spaces for Contemporary Art

Sol LeWitt’s “Wall Drawing #352,” 1980 Credit Wadsworth Atheneum Museum of Art        

Sol LeWitt’s “Wall Drawing #352,” 1980 Credit Wadsworth Atheneum Museum of Art        

In 1844, the Wadsworth Atheneum Museum of Art’s inaugural exhibition included Thomas Cole’s “Mt. Etna From Taormina,” completed the year before. Two years later, the fledgling institution purchased Frederic Edwin Church’s first painting, the brand-new “Hooker and Company Journeying Through the Wilderness From Plymouth to Hartford, in 1636.”

Now an encyclopedic museum with a collection of 50,000 items, the Atheneum has maintained its commitment to show and acquire contemporary art.

There are 70 works on view by a roster of eminent artists, including Jackson Pollock, Robert Rauschenberg and Andy Warhol. Some of the pieces haven’t been shown in decades; others have never been exhibited.

Making its debut is Tony Smith’s “New Piece,” a dramatically distorted cubic form from 1966. The sculpture is on view in the Huntington Gallery, which is devoted to postwar art.

“New Piece” is surrounded by seven paintings that Smith donated to the Atheneum in 1967. They include one of Barnett Newman’s “zip” paintings, “Onement II,” with its vertical brick-red stripe slicing through a scarlet field; Mark Rothko’s 1949 “Untitled,” an arrangement of abstract forms that foreshadows his iconic imagery of the 1950s; and Clyfford Still’s “Number 5,” a vivid yellow canvas with splashes of color that seem to leap off its surface.

Its continuing Matrix series, which has presented solo exhibitions by more than 170 cutting-edge artists, marks its 40th anniversary this year.

And this weekend, the museum is opening two permanent galleries dedicated to contemporary art. As part of a five-year, $33 million renovation scheduled to conclude in the fall, the galleries — covering more than 7,000 square feet — have been refurbished and reinstalled with significant objects from the collection.

Don’t Mess with Texas Art Contest for Kids

What:

Texas elementary school students enrolled in kindergarten through fifth grade are invited to participate in the Texas Department of Transportation (“TxDOT”) and Keep Texas Beautiful (“KTB”) (collectively “Sponsors”) Don’t mess with Texas® Elementary School Art Contest (“Contest”) to create artwork for the 2016 Don’t mess with Texas Calendar.

Entries will promote the Don’t mess with Texas and/ or Keep Texas Beautiful litter prevention slogans in order to encourage the protection of our Texas roadways and environment. The purpose of the Contest is to inspire our future leaders to refrain from littering, advocate litter prevention, and keep Texas beautiful.

Designs will be judged based on creativity and uniqueness, inclusion of a litter prevention message and interpretation of theme, overall visual appeal, composition, and age appropriateness. Winners will be announced online in May 2015.

Students who create the top 13 winning designs will have their artwork assigned to a month, or placed on the cover of the 2016 Don’t mess with Texas Calendar. Each will also win an iDeaUSA 8 tablet donated by H-E-B and Central Market. All student winners and runners-up may be showcased on the Don’t mess with Texas and Keep Texas Beautiful websites and social media sites, at the 2015 Keep Texas Beautiful annual conference, in media announcements, and through other means, as appropriate.

Teachers representing students who produce the top 13 designs will each win a $100 H-E-B and Central Market gift card. See Contest Official Rules for details (PDF, 115 KB).

When:

The contest begins January 12, 2015. All entries must be submitted by April 18, 2015. Winners will be announced in early May 2015, and prizes will be distributed by May 22, 2015.

How:

Elementary school teachers across Texas should set aside class time for their students to create artwork appropriate for the 2016 Don’t mess with Texas Calendar. This project can be completed in one day or several days to give students enough time to finish their design. After the students’ artwork is submitted, it will be judged by Keep Texas Beautiful affiliates, teacher volunteers, and graphic design professionals.

Download the full Contest Official Rules (PDF, 115 KB) and Contest Entry Form and Agreement (PDF, 238 KB) for students and parents/guardians, and display a flyer (PDF, 2.5MB) in your classroom or school hallway to create buzz!

Why:

Did you know that Texans ages 16 to 34 are the most likely to litter? We need to do all we can to motivate young Texans to keep our environment free from trash. This contest is a great way to share the Don’t mess with Texas and Keep Texas Beautiful messages with your elementary school students so that they learn good habits from an early age.

The purpose of the contest is to encourage our future leaders to prevent littering, protect our roadways, and keep Texas beautiful. Download a Litter Fact Sheet (PDF, 124 KB) to use during class discussion.

Questions?

Call Keep Texas Beautiful at 1 (800) CLEAN-TX or email info@ktb.org.

Visit the Keep Texas Beautiful website.

Why Self-Censorship of Controversial Artwork is Wrong

Photo via: National Review Online

Photo via: National Review Online

Following the shocking events of the massacres and sieges in Paris, a debate has raged over whether or not to publish images of the prophet Muhammad for fear of reprisals, apparently from whichever shadowy fundamentalists might be out there.

So, the latest news, that London's Victoria & Albert Museum quietly pulled from its website a reproduction of a 1990 Iranian poster depicting Muhammad, held in the V&A's collection, is dispiriting. Citing the level of “security alert" the V&A has to operate under, a spokeswoman defended that the work, “as with most of our reserve collections, would be made available to scholars and researchers by appointment."

The fractious discussion that has arisen on the subject of whether or not media organizations pulling or refusing to publish supposedly blasphemous images are “chicken" has generated more heat than light in the last few weeks; and revelations about how art museums put images on display is only going to provoke similar revelations in the future and put museum staff even more on their guard.

But while we desperately need an open debate about free speech and the freedom to offend in our society, the obsessive focus on Muslims, religion, and blasphemy has diverted attention away from the bigger question of how we handle offending and being offended as part of a big, broad society where not everyone is going to agree.

And that that takes us right into the question of how many parts of society have become hyper-ready to be offended at every expression that crosses a line for them. It also exposes how the idea of what it means to live as part of a “general public" has been confused, and presses at the real meaning of tolerance.

In an interesting blog post for the Guardian, Lois Keidan (head of London's Live Art Development Agency) reports how, due to the increasing use of social media, she increasingly receives messages of outrage from people who have unwittingly attended live art events whose content they subsequently found upsetting, traumatic, or offensive.

Noting that one of these was “an evening of queer body art," Keidan argues that all the events in question “were under the radar, artist-run, and aimed at specific ‘communities of interest.' "

Yet those offended assumed that, while they had attended an event aimed at a particular “community of interest" they may not have shared, their own sensitivities trumped those of the rest of the audience and the artists. Keidan concludes that today many people “feel entitled, not just to enter spaces and places where they do not necessarily belong, but also to demand censure and closure if they don't like what they find there."

Keidan makes the fair point that not all art is made with everybody in mind, but by and for particular groups. It's also fair to ask that if you turn up as a member of the public, you accept that you might not encounter artworks that totally fit your worldview. And, yet, Keidan's point of view only really works if one assumes that every artwork should only be seen by those “attuned to it," those who are part of its “community of interest." And the trouble with that is that to demand such “safe spaces" for “underground culture," as Keidan does, eventually means shutting the whole of our cultural life into little boxes marked “niche interest," in which different groups get to make culture as if nobody else mattered. And the flipside of this is often that, when particular groups decide that they're entitled to make art for themselves, nobody else has the right to express any view that is critical of their own position or self-identity.

But boxing up art and culture to suit each and every “community of interest," safely shutting it away so it offends nobody on the “outside," becomes the easiest response in any time where it appears no one can agree about anything, and in which the first reaction is to shut people up or shut artworks down.

And—coming back to Charlie Hebdo—where might fundamentalists get the idea that you can shut down those public expressions you don't find palatable? Maybe one should look no further than our "liberal" culture, in which regardless of whether it's topless models in a tabloid newspaper, or tableaux-vivants in an art gallery, the response everyone seems all too happy to reach for is “shut that down, I'm offended!"

Maybe we are offended. It happens. Public life is not always a pleasant place to be. We should discuss, argue, criticize. But “shut it down"? Before we know it, everything we want to say, every artwork we want to present, will find itself shut up in a box, a sign on the door marked “by appointment only to the appropriate community of interest."

Maybe we could start by taking back the ideal of tolerance that makes public life livable; that we acknowledge one another's differences, that we're not always going to agree, that we're going to find certain opinions and expressions hurtful; and that this is better than being confined to a cell. That it would be better, as that great American phrase would have it, that we “deal with it."

Less Is More: Ad Reinhardt’s 12 Rules for Pure Art

Zhong Yao, Spirit Above All 1-93A, 2012, acrylic on denim.©THE ARTIST. COURTESY PACE LONDON AND WHITECHAPEL GALLERY

Zhong Yao, Spirit Above All 1-93A, 2012, acrylic on denim.
©THE ARTIST. COURTESY PACE LONDON AND WHITECHAPEL GALLERY

“Twelve Rules for a New Academy”
By Ad Reinhardt

How a well-known abstract painter would “give certain rules to our art” in order to “render it pure”

Evil and error in art are art’s own “uses” and “actions.” The sins and sufferings of art are always its own improper involvements and mixtures, its own mindless realisms and expressionisms.

The humiliation and trivialization of art in America during the last three decades have been the easy exploitations and eager popularizations by the American artists themselves. Ashcan- and Armory-Expressionists mixed their art up with life-muck-raking and art-marketing. Social- and Surreal-Expressionists of the ‘thirties used art as an “action-on-the-public,” but succeeded mainly in expressing themselves, and Abstract-Expressionists of the ‘forties and ‘fifties using art initially as a “self-expression,” succeeded in acting upon the whole world. The business boom of the ‘twenties orphaned the alienated artist but the great depression of the ‘thirties witnessed the tender engagement of art to government. Ten years after that, the ardent marriage of art and business and war was celebrated with Pepsi-Cola in ceremonial contests called “Artists for Victory” at America’s greatest museum of art. By the ‘fifties, armies of art’s offsprings were off to school and Sunday school, crusading for art-education and religious decoration.

From “Artists for Ashcan and Dust-Bowl” to “Artists for America-First and Social Security” to “Artists for Victory” to “Artists for Action in Business, Religion and Education,” the portrait of the artist in America in the twentieth century shapes up into a figure resembling Al Capp’s “Available Jones,” who is always available to anyone, any time, for anything at all, at any price.

The conception of art as “fine,” “high,” “noble,” “free,” “liberal,” and “ideal” has always been academic. The argument of free or fine artists has never been between art and something else, but “between true art and art submitted to some other, quite different, values.” “There are not two arts, there is only one.” “No man can embrace true art till he has explored and cast out false art.” The academy of art, whether the Western or Eastern ideal, has always aimed at “the correction of the artist,” not “the enlightenment of the public.” The idea of the “academy” of art in seventeenth century, of “esthetics” in the eighteenth, of the “independence” of art in the nineteenth century, and of the “purity” of art in the twentieth, restate, in those centuries in Europe and America, the same “one point of view.” Fine art can only be defined as exclusive, negative, absolute and timeless. It is not practical, useful, related, applicable or subservient to anything else. Fine art has its own thought, its own history and tradition, its own reason, its own discipline. It has its own “integrity” and not someone else’s “integration” with something else.

Fine art is not “a means of making a living” or “a way of living a life.” Art that is a matter of life and death cannot be fine or free art. An artist who dedicates his life to art, burdens his art with his life and his life with his art. “Art is Art, and Life is Life.”

The “tradition” of art is art “out of time,” art made fine, art emptied and purified of all other-than-art meanings, and a museum of fine art should exclude everything but fine art. The art tradition stands as the antique-present model of what has been achieved and what does not need to be achieved again. Tradition shows the artist what not to do. “Reason” in art shows what art is not. “Higher Education for artist should be ‘liberal,’ ‘free’ and the ‘learning of greatness.'” “To teach and enlighten is the task of virtuous men.” “No great painter was ever self-taught.” “Artists must learn and learn to forget their learning.” “The way to know is to forget.”

The Guardian of the True Tradition in Art is the Academy of Fine Art: “to give certain rules to our art and render it pure.” The first rule and absolute standard of fine art, and painting, which is the highest and freest art, is the purity of it. The more uses, relations and “additions” a painting has, the less pure it is. The more stuff in it, the busier the work of art, the worse it is. “More is less.”

The less an artist thinks in non-artistic terms and the less he exploits the easy, common skills, the more of an artist he is. “The less an artist obtrudes himself in his painting, the purer and clearer his aims.” The less exposed a painting is to a chance public, the better. “Less is more.”

The Six Traditions to be studied are: (1) the pure icon, (2) pure perspective, pure line and pure brushwork, (3) the pure landscape, (4) the pure portrait, (5) the pure still-life, (6) pure form, pure color, and pure monochrome. “Study ten thousand paintings and walk ten thousand miles.” “Externally keep yourself away from all relationships, and internally, have no hankerings in your heart.” “The pure old men of old slept without dreams and waked without anxiety.”

The Six General Canons or the Six Noes to be memorized are: (1) No Realism or Existentialism. “When the vulgar and commonplace dominate, the spirit subsides.” (2) No Impressionism. “The artist should once and forever emancipate himself from the bondage of appearance.” “The eye is a menace to clear sight.” (3) No Expressionism or Surrealism. “The laying bare of oneself,” autobiographically or socially, “is obscene.” (4) No Fauvism, primitivism or brute art. “Art begins with the getting-rid of nature.” (5) No Constructivism, sculpture, plasticism, or graphic arts. No collage, paste, paper, sand or string. (6) No “trompe-l’oeil,” interior decoration or architecture. The ordinary qualities and common sensitivities of these activities lie outside free and intellectual art.

The Twelve Technical Rules (or How to Achieve the Twelve Things to Avoid) to be followed are:

1. No texture. Texture is naturalistic or mechanical and is a vulgar quality, especially pigment-texture or impasto. Palette-knifing, canvas-stabbing, paint-scumbling and other action-techniques are unintelligent and to be avoided. No accidents or automatism.

2. No brushwork or calligraphy. Hand-writing, hand-working and hand-jerking are personal and in poor taste. No signature or trade-marking. “Brushwork should be invisible.” “One should never let the influence of evil demons gain control of the brush.”

3. No sketching or drawing. Everything, where to begin and where to end, should be worked out in the mind beforehand. “In painting, the idea should exist in the mind before the brush is taken up.” No line or outline. “Madmen see outlines and therefore they draw them.” A line is a figure, a “square is a face.” No shading or streaking.

4. No forms. “The finest has no shape.” No figure or fore- or background. No volume or mass, no cylinder, sphere or cone, or cube or boogie-woogie. No push or pull. “No shape or substance.”

5. No design. “Design is everywhere.”

6. No colors. “Color blinds.” “Colors are an aspect of appearance and so only of the surface,” and are “a distracting embellishment.” Colors are barbaric, unstable, suggest life, “cannot be completely controlled” and “should be concealed.” No white. “White is a color, and all colors.” White is “antiseptic and not artistic, appropriate and pleasing for kitchen fixtures, and hardly the medium for expressing truth and beauty.” White on white is “a transition from pigment to light” and “a screen for the projection of light” and “moving” pictures.

7. No light. No bright or direct light in or over the painting. Dim, late afternoon, non-reflecting twilight is best outside. No chiaroscuro, “the maldorant reality of craftsmen, beggars, topers with rags and wrinkles.”

8. No space. Space should be empty, should not project, and should not be flat. “The painting should be behind the picture frame.” The frame should isolate and protect the painting from its surroundings. Space divisions within the painting should not be seen.

9. No time. “Clock-time or man’s time is inconsequential.” “There is no ancient or modern, no past or future in art. A work of art is always present.” The present is the future of the past, not the past of the future.

10. No size or scale. Breadth and depth of thought and feeling in art have no relation to physical size. Large sizes are aggressive, positivist, intemperate, venal and graceless.

11. No movement. “Everything is on the move. Art should be still.”

12. No object, no subject, no matter. No symbols, images or signs. Neither pleasure nor pain. No mindless working or mindless non-working. No chessplaying.

Supplementary regulations are: No easel or palette. Low, flat, sturdy benches work well. Brushes should be new, clean, flat, even, 1 inch wide and strong. “If the heart is upright, the brush is firm.” No noise. “The brush should pass over the surface lightly and smoothly” and quietly. No rubbing or scraping. Paint should be permanent, free of impurities, mixed and stored in jars. The scent should be of “pure spirits of turpentine, unadulterated and freshly distilled.” “The glue should be as clean as possible.” Canvas is better than silk or paper, linen better than cotton. There should be no shine in the finish. Gloss reflects and relates to the changing surroundings. “A picture is finished when all traces of the means used to bring about the end have disappeared.”

The fine art studio should have a “rain-tight roof” and be 25 feet wide and 30 feet long, with extra space for storage and sink. Paintings should be stored away and not continually looked at. The ceiling should be 12 feet high. The studio should be separate from the home and living, “away from the claims of concubinage and matrimony.” A fine art department should be separate from the rest of the school.

The fine artist should have a fine mind, “free of all passion, ill-will and delusion1.”

Egypt conservationists to sue over 'botched' Egyptian Pharaoh Tutankhamun mask repair

A picture taken on January 23, 2015 shows the burial mask of Egyptian Pharaoh Tutankhamun, who ruled Egypt from 1334 to 1325 BC, at the Cairo museum in the Egyptian capital. An Egyptian conservation group said it would sue the antiquities minister o…

A picture taken on January 23, 2015 shows the burial mask of Egyptian Pharaoh Tutankhamun, who ruled Egypt from 1334 to 1325 BC, at the Cairo museum in the Egyptian capital. An Egyptian conservation group said it would sue the antiquities minister over a 'botched' repair of the mask of Tutankhamun that left a crust of dried glue on the priceless relic. AFP PHOTO / MOHAMED EL-SHAHED.

An Egyptian conservation group said Friday it will sue the antiquities minister over a "botched" repair of the mask of King Tutankhamun that left a crust of dried glue on the priceless relic.

The golden funerary mask, seen Friday by AFP at the Egyptian Museum, showed the sticky aftermath of what appears to have been overzealous use of glue to fix the mask's beard in place.

A museum official, who spoke anonymously to avoid repercussions, told AFP the beard had fallen of accidentally when the mask was removed from its case last year to repair the lighting.

Museum head Mahmoud al-Helwagy denied that conservation workers had damaged the mask

"This is illogical and inconceivable," he told AFP. "These are conservation workers, not carpenters."

Antiquities Minister Mahmud al-Damaty also denied that the 3,000-year-old relic was treated carelessly.

"The job was done correctly," he told AFP, without explaining why curators needed to fix the mask.

Monica Hanna, an Egyptologist who inspected the mask, said what she saw had so shocked her that her group was taking the matter to the public prosecutor.

"We are presenting a complaint on mismanagement to the prosecutor tomorrow," said Hanna, from Egypt's Heritage Task Force, which has long battled mismanagement and looting of Egypt's legendary ancient artefacts.

According to the museum official, "there seems to have been a lapse in concentration and the mask hit the case and almost fell" when it was removed from its case.

"So (the curator) grabbed it in his arms to break the fall, and the beard separated," he said.

The long braided beard fit into the mask with a peg, and had been separated before, the official said. 

"This mistake can happen. But what caused it to get worse? The curator was scared and he fixed it hastily."

The epoxy glue dried very quickly, said the official. 

"You should use material (that dries slowly) and then support it, maybe over several hours or 24 hours, so you can fix mistakes," he said.

"Renovation work needs an adhesive that is easy to remove in case there is any damage, without leaving any traces."

Museum director Helwagy told the official MENA news agency that epoxy glue is used internationally to fix artefacts.

The death mask of the enigmatic boy king is one of the crown jewels of the museum, which also houses the mummy of Pharaoh Ramses II.

The museum used to attract millions of tourists before a 2011 revolt -- centred in nearby Tahrir Square -- brought down president Hosni Mubarak and unleashed four years of tumult.

Color of the Week

This weeks color is #44bb8d

The hex color #44bb8d is the combination of RGB(68, 187, 141), Red color 26.667%, Green color 73.333% and Blue color 55.294% in RGB color space. In the CMYK color space aka Process color space, #44bb8d is the combination of cmyk(63.6, 0, 24.6, 26.7), 63.636% Cyan color, 0% Magenta color, 24.599% Yellow color and 26.667% Black color.

Brought to you by Davis & Co.

“Thinking, Feeling, Head, Heart”

Kevin Atkinson, Thinking, Feeling, Head, Heart, c.1976, oil on canvas, 5’ 6” x 5’ 6”.

Kevin Atkinson, Thinking, Feeling, Head, Heart, c.1976, oil on canvas, 5’ 6” x 5’ 6”.

THE NEW CHURCH MUSEUM
102 New Church Street, Tamboerskloof
December 2–April 25

CAPE TOWN

The history of painterly abstraction in South Africa remains atomized and fragmentary in part because of lingering animosities about its bland rehearsal of an imported style and, decisively perhaps, its inability to visualize the struggle against apartheid, which prompted curators and publishers to bypass the abstract in favor of social-realist and agitprop work. This exhibition, rather than recapitulating history, offers a selective survey of this overlooked genre and draws predominantly from the holdings of the New Church Museum. Guest curator Marilyn Martin named this show after a billowing black-and-white composition, Thinking, Feeling, Head, Heart, ca. 1976 by Kevin Atkinson, a former teacher of Marlene Dumas. It hangs in a room adjacent to the entrance and next to the show’s oldest work, an atypical jumble of black calligraphic marks titled Abstract on White and Blue from 1957 by Walter Battiss.

Martin eschews chronology in favor of juxtaposing works by first- and second-wave abstract painters with recent works by contemporary artists. Sometimes this strategy yields insightful results, as in the pairing of two untitled Ernest Mancoba drawings, dated c. 1970s and 1993 respectively, with a paper sculpture sutured with ribbons and rubber tubes by Nicholas Hlobo titled Andilibali Okwendlovu, 2008. The curatorial conceit is resisted, though, by works such as Dineo Seshee Bopape’s installation Uncontested Metaphor, 2013, an asymmetrical piece of fabric accompanied by a work on paper and a length of rope that is essentially modular in form. Along with Gerda Scheepers’s Medium and Modality Piece [Speak Easy], 2013, a uniformly blue canvas with fabric embellishments featuring rudimentary marks and displayed as a sculpture, these two cryptic and magnetic works are the unexpected highlights, as both artists have produced singular works that refuse company or comparison.

Supreme Court Declines to Hear Norton Simon's Nazi-Loot Appeal

Lucas Cranach the Elder's paintings of Adam and Eve at the Norton Simon Museum.Photo: Rachael Moore/Flickr.

Lucas Cranach the Elder's paintings of Adam and Eve at the Norton Simon Museum.
Photo: Rachael Moore/Flickr.

The US Supreme Court has rejected the appeal of Pasadena's Norton Simon Museum in the case of the ownership of Lucas Cranach the Elder's paintings Adam and Eve (both circa 1530). The artworks originally belonged to Jewish art dealer Jacques Goudstikker, who in 1940 was forced to flee the Netherlands following the Nazi invasion.

The case, which has been in federal court since 2007, was originally dismissed in the museum's favor in 2012. Goudstikker's daughter-in-law, Marei Von Saher, got a second chance last June, when a judge ruled that the pursuit of her claims did not conflict with US federal policy (see Norton Simon's Nazi-Looted Adam and Eve to Head Back to Court).

In response, the Norton Simon appealed in the hopes that a rehearing in the Ninth Circuit by an 11-judge panel would reverse the decision once again (see Norton Simon Museum Asks Court to Reconsider Nazi Loot Claim). The museum believes that Goudstikker's widow, Desi, should have pressed her claim with the government of the Netherlands after World War II.

During the war, Goudstikker was forced to sell the paintings to Nazi leader Hermann Göring. The canvases were later recovered by Allied forces and returned to their countries of origin. Desi did not trust that the government would treat her fairly, and refused to negotiate for the paintings' restitution.

Instead, the works were sold in 1966 to George Stroganoff-Scherbatoff, a descendant of their pre-Goudstikker owners, who had lost the paintings during Soviet rule. In 1971, the Norton Simon foundation purchased Adam and Eve for $4 million (adjusted for inflation, they were said to be worth $28.3 million in 2006). The institution now argues that Von Saher had her chance under US policy, and her claim conflicts with the country's right to conduct its foreign affairs.

"Allowing her lawsuit to proceed would encourage the Museum . . . to follow the Washington Principles [which call for restitution]," countered the Ninth circuit in its opinion. "Perhaps most importantly, this litigation may provide Von Saher an opportunity to achieve a just and fair outcome to rectify the consequences of the forced transaction with Göring during the war."

Though the latest ruling is good news for Von Saher, her lawyer, Herrick Feinstein's Lawrence Kaye, warned the Art Newspaper that “not all the museum's technical defenses have been decided." A judge could still decline to hear the case as it was filed after the statute of limitations expired.

In a statement, the Norton Simon insisted it “remains confident that it holds complete and proper title to Adam and Eve, and will continue to pursue . . . all appropriate legal options."

Art Spiegelman Criticizes US Press Over Charlie Hebdo Political Correctness

Pulitzer Prize-winning comic aritst Art Spiegelman. Photo courtesy: Wikimedia Commons

Pulitzer Prize-winning comic aritst Art Spiegelman. Photo courtesy: Wikimedia Commons

Pulitzer Prize-winning comic artist Art Spiegelman has recently spoken out against the decision of many US media outlets to not republish the cartoons that were featured in Charlie Hebdo, the French satirical publication that was attacked on January 7 (see 12 Killed at Magazine Previously Attacked for Satirical Cartoons).

"I think it's so hypocritical to drape yourself in freedom of speech and then self-censor yourself to the point where you are not making your readers understand the issues," Spiegelman told the AFP. "That cartoon was not making fun of the prophet, it was excoriating the believers who would kill."

Media outlets such as the New York Times, the Associated Press, CNN, and NBC News have refused to show images of the cover from the latest issue of Charlie Hebdo. (see "Are Cartoons More Powerful Than Art?") News outlets have resorted to blurring and cropping photographs of the now famous image of Muhammad holding a sign that reads "Je Suis Charlie" to hide potentially offensive material, leading Spiegelman to argue that journalists  are choosing political correctness over freedom of speech.

"We have a standard that is long held and that serves us well: that there is a line between gratuitous insult and satire. Most of these are gratuitous insult," said Dean Baquet, executive editor of the New York Times, according to a blog post written by the public editor Margaret Sullivan.

Spiegelman, whose Pulitzer Prize-winning graphic novel “Maus" depicts his Jewish father's experience during the Holocaust, shows frank depictions of Jews as mice in World War II Nazi concentration camps.

He has accused many news outlets as having a "mega-fanatic zeal to be polite" and points out that Charlie Hebdo was not targeting Muslims, as the publication has printed caricatures of orthodox Jews and the Pope as well.

"When religion overlaps with social and political issues, it's necessary to fight back, so Charlie is equally hard on Jews including anti-semitic caricatures and quotes when talking about Israel," he said. "The equal opportunity insult that came with Charlie Hebdo was the reason it's estimable."